Profile 8. shows the outcome for the very first and you can next formant within avoid of your vowel preceding /?/ and also in the product quality Gloss and you may brand new alternatives.
As far as this new frequency regarding F1 of the before vowel can be involved, the outcomes point to a lower life expectancy F1 on the the new variation off compared to its Fundamental Shine involved sound (NV 594 Hz versus. SP 665 Hz, t=?dos.730, p : t=?2.204, p
The results along with showed that brand new F3 regularity of one’s after the vowel are notably highest throughout the new variations when comparing to the product quality Shine variants. SP dos,831 Hz, t=2 kissbrides.com useful link.763, p : NV dos,939 Hz compared to. SP 2,810 Hz, t=2.567, p . 325, p was rather more regarding the Simple Gloss and you will the fresh alternatives; F1 volume assortment was lower in the newest version (/?/: NV ?87 Hz versus. SP ?33 Hz, t=?dos.086, p : NV ?121 Hz versus. ?67 Hz, t=?dos.086, p=.055 (during the amount of analytical interest)). No significant difference among them variants is actually discover into the F2 and you can F3 regularity directory of the latest before vowel. Also, the latest F1, F2 and F3 volume ranges of one’s pursuing the vowel just weren’t significantly various other when you look at the Fundamental Gloss therefore the the newest version.
No high variations was in fact based in the duration of frication away from the fricative in addition to affricate: while you are Basic Polish /?/ enjoys the common duration of 0.098 s, the common property value brand new variation try 0.101 s. The fresh new fricative the main affricate was 0.061 s within the Simple Polish and 0.058 s about the latest version.
In every the latest analyses displayed over the influence from Speech Build and you will Stress is extreme only in a number of designs. The outcomes away from speech design try uniform somewhat with the research out-of Maniwa ainsi que al. (2009), which showed that English fricatives showcase more acoustic attributes for the a conversational compared to. a very clear layout. REPETITION was more often extreme, albeit solely, during the formants and you can cycle, and more appear to in affricates than in fricatives; understand the outcome of the analytical analyses for the Appendix C.
3.step 1. Linear discriminant investigation
The study showed a lot more than things to high variations in numerous variables involving the the fresh and you may Simple Gloss sibilant. The reason for next linear discriminant analysis (LDA) they to exhibit hence of investigated details will be very helpful in discerning the newest variant regarding the Basic Polish variation and you will what percentage of the details can be precisely categorized by the using this type of analytical approach. We utilized the LDA which have jacknifed (we.e., exit you to definitely aside) forecasts. New LDA used to be effectively used for the newest discrimination from English fricatives (Jongman ainsi que al. 2000; McMurray and you may Jongman 2011). In accordance with the analysis showed over, we’ll remain fricatives and you can affricates inside independent groups.
In the case of the fresh influence regarding REPETITION is actually rather different about Simple Polish and you may the brand new variant (t = ?dos
All of the acoustic parameters showed within the (4) had been provided because predictors regarding the LDA long lasting truth one to some of them just weren’t extreme regarding the linear regression activities. The newest LDA outputs an individual means you to better discriminates one another variants out-of fricatives (Important Shine compared to. the newest variation). Given that spectral level and you may COG firmly correlated together (0.79), the former has also been omitted from the design. Overall, 19 predictors fitted this new LDA, nine where did not significantly contribute to the latest discrimination of the high quality Shine rather than the new variant. And therefore, the rest details (10) was installing on the last design. Brand new model was extremely extreme (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.5251, ?2 = , df = 10, p rather than its related the fresh variants.
